ZXTR2105F-7 vs MCP1700T-3302E/MAY Linear Regulators: Component Comparison

Quick verdict

For automotive and high-voltage input applications requiring moderate current (up to ~90mA) and extended temperature range, the ZXTR2105F-7 is the better choice due to its 60V input rating and AEC-Q101 qualification. For low-voltage, low-quiescent-current, and higher load current (up to 250mA) applications with tight dropout requirements and integrated protection, the MCP1700T-3302E/MAY is superior.

Spec comparison table

SpecZXTR2105F-7MCP1700T-3302E/MAYNotes
Control featuresNone specifiedOver Current, Over Temperature, Short CircuitMCP1700T offers built-in protection, important for robustness; ZXTR2105F lacks this.
Quiescent current (Iq)800 µA4 µAMCP1700T is significantly lower, critical for battery-powered or low-power designs.
Max supply current6.7 mANot specifiedZXTR2105F max supply current is low; unclear for MCP1700T, likely not a limiting factor.
GradeAutomotiveNot specifiedZXTR2105F is AEC-Q101 qualified for automotive use; MCP1700T not automotive grade.
Max input voltage60 V6 VZXTR2105F supports much higher input voltages, suitable for harsh or high-voltage rails.
Mounting typeSurface MountSurface MountBoth are SMT; no difference.
Number of regulators11Both single-output devices.
Operating temperature range-65°C to 150°C-40°C to 125°CZXTR2105F supports wider temperature range, better for extreme environments.
Output configurationPositivePositiveBoth fixed positive regulators.
Max output current89 mA250 mAMCP1700T supports almost 3× higher load current.
Output typeFixedFixedBoth fixed voltage outputs.
Output voltage5 V3.3 VZXTR2105F fixed at 5 V; MCP1700T fixed at 3.3 V.
Package caseTO-236-3 (SOT-23-3, SC-59)6-DFN (2x2) Exposed PadMCP1700T’s exposed pad improves thermal dissipation in a smaller footprint.
Protection featuresNone specifiedOver Current, Over Temperature, Short CircuitMCP1700T has integrated protections, important for fault conditions.
PSRR (100 Hz)46 dB44 dBZXTR2105F slightly better PSRR at low frequency, marginal difference.
QualificationAEC-Q101None specifiedZXTR2105F suited for automotive qualification requirements.
Voltage dropout maxNot specified0.35 V @ 250 mAMCP1700T dropout specified, useful for low-voltage headroom design; ZXTR2105F unknown.

Design trade-offs

The most striking difference between these regulators is their input voltage rating and maximum output current. ZXTR2105F-7 supports an input voltage up to 60 V with a modest maximum output current of 89 mA, making it suitable for automotive and industrial applications where input rails can be high and transient voltages are common. Its AEC-Q101 qualification and extended temperature range (-65°C to 150°C) further emphasize its fit for harsh environments. However, the ZXTR2105F has a relatively high quiescent current of 800 µA, which can be a significant power drain in battery-powered systems or energy-conscious designs.

In contrast, the MCP1700T-3302E/MAY targets low-voltage systems with a maximum input of 6 V and a higher output current capability of 250 mA, making it more appropriate for general embedded systems and portable electronics. Its extremely low quiescent current of 4 µA allows for much better efficiency during idle or light load conditions, which can extend battery life substantially. This regulator also specifies a maximum dropout voltage of 0.35 V at full load, enabling use in low-headroom scenarios where the input voltage is only slightly above the output.

Thermal considerations differ as well; MCP1700T’s 6-DFN package with an exposed pad facilitates better thermal dissipation than the smaller SOT-23-3 used by the ZXTR2105F, which is limited in its power dissipation capacity. This difference is relevant when operating near maximum current or in constrained thermal environments.

From a protection standpoint, the MCP1700T offers integrated overcurrent, overtemperature, and short-circuit protections, enhancing system reliability and potentially reducing external protection components. The ZXTR2105F lacks documented protection features, so external safeguards are recommended, especially in automotive or industrial applications.

Layout sensitivity will favor the MCP1700T in applications requiring tight thermal management and compact PCB real estate, while the ZXTR2105F’s wider operating temperature and input voltage range come with the trade-off of higher quiescent current and limited output current. Cost at volume is not specified here, but generally, automotive-qualified parts like ZXTR2105F may carry a premium compared to general-purpose regulators like MCP1700T.

Use-case fit

Choose ZXTR2105F-7 when…

Choose MCP1700T-3302E/MAY when…

Drop-in compatibility

There is no indication from the datasheets that the ZXTR2105F-7 and MCP1700T-3302E/MAY are pin- or footprint-compatible. The ZXTR2105F comes in a SOT-23-3 package (TO-236-3, SC-59), while the MCP1700T uses a 6-pin DFN (2x2 mm) with an exposed thermal pad. The pinouts and package outlines differ significantly, so substituting one for the other would require PCB layout changes and possibly schematic modifications.

Additionally, the fixed output voltages differ (5 V vs. 3.3 V), so direct replacement is not possible without adjusting the system voltage requirements.

Alternatives to consider