UM6K33NTN vs 2N7002BKS,115 MOSFET Array Comparison

Quick verdict

For low-current, low-voltage logic-level switching where minimal gate drive is critical, the UM6K33NTN’s 1.2 V logic-level gate and low input capacitance make it the better choice. Conversely, for applications requiring higher current capability, greater power dissipation, and higher voltage margin, the 2N7002BKS,115 offers superior performance despite a higher gate threshold and input capacitance.


Spec comparison table

SpecUM6K33NTN2N7002BKS,115Notes
Configuration2 N-Channel (Dual)2 N-Channel (Dual)Equivalent dual N-MOSFET arrays
Drain-Source Voltage Max (V)50 V60 V2N7002BKS,115 supports 10 V higher voltage, better for 48 V or 60 V rails
Continuous Drain Current Id @ 25°C200 mA300 mA (Ta)2N7002BKS,115 offers 50% higher continuous current capacity
Power Dissipation Max (mW)120 mW295 mW2N7002BKS,115 can dissipate more than twice the power, improving thermal margin
Rds(on) Max @ Id, Vgs2.2 Ω @ 200 mA, 4.5 V1.6 Ω @ 500 mA, 10 V2N7002BKS,115 has lower Rds(on) but measured at higher current and gate voltage
Input Capacitance Ciss Max @ Vds=10V25 pF50 pFUM6K33NTN has half the input capacitance, reducing gate charge and switching losses
Gate Threshold Voltage Vgs_th Max1 V @ 1 mA2.1 V @ 250 µAUM6K33NTN turns on at lower gate voltage, better for low-voltage logic level drive
Gate Drive FeatureLogic Level Gate, 1.2 V DriveLogic Level GateUM6K33NTN explicitly supports 1.2 V drive, better for ultra-low-voltage gate drive
Max Operating Junction Temperature150 °C150 °CEquivalent operating temperature range
Package6-TSSOP (UMT6 / SOT-363)6-TSSOP (SOT-363)Same package outline, facilitates PCB footprint reuse
Power Dissipation Typical (mW)120 mW295 mW2N7002BKS,115 typical dissipation more than double UM6K33NTN
Gate Charge Qg Max @ VgsNot specified0.6 nC @ 4.5 VLower gate charge on 2N7002BKS,115 may improve switching speed despite higher capacitance
Leakage Current Max @ 25°CNot specified1 µA2N7002BKS,115 leakage is low and specified, useful for low-leakage designs
Drain Current PeakNot specified1.2 A2N7002BKS,115 supports short pulse peak currents, enabling transient load handling
Switching Times (td_on/off, tfall)Not specifiedtd_on typ 10 ns, td_off typ 24 ns, tfall typ 7 ns2N7002BKS,115 has documented switching speed, useful for high-frequency switching
ESD RatingNot specified2 kV2N7002BKS,115 includes ESD robustness rating, beneficial in harsh environments
Thermal Resistance (typical per transistor)Not specified370 K/WKnown thermal resistance on 2N7002BKS,115 helps thermal design calculations
QualificationNot specifiedAEC-Q1012N7002BKS,115 is automotive qualified, potentially more reliable in automotive applications
Storage Temperature RangeNot specified-65 to 150 °C2N7002BKS,115 has extended storage range

Design trade-offs

The UM6K33NTN is optimized for low-voltage gate drive environments with a gate threshold around 1 V and guaranteed logic-level operation at 1.2 V, making it suitable for modern low-voltage digital logic interfaces. Its substantially lower input capacitance (25 pF vs 50 pF) reduces gate charge requirements and switching losses, which can be significant in low-current, low-frequency switching or battery-powered systems. However, its maximum continuous drain current is limited to 200 mA, and its maximum power dissipation is only 120 mW, constraining its use in higher load or thermal environments.

The 2N7002BKS,115 supports a higher continuous current of 300 mA and a peak drain current of 1.2 A, which is beneficial for transient loads or slightly higher power switching tasks. Its Rds(on) is lower at 1.6 Ω at 10 V gate drive and 500 mA, but this comes at the cost of a higher gate threshold voltage (~2.1 V max) and double the input capacitance, which means that gate drive circuits must supply more charge and handle a higher gate voltage to fully enhance the device. Additionally, the 2N7002BKS,115 supports a higher maximum voltage (60 V), increasing design margin for 48 V or 60 V rails.

Thermally, the 2N7002BKS,115 can dissipate more than twice the power of the UM6K33NTN, making it more robust in applications with limited heat sinking or higher ambient temperatures. Its documented switching times and ESD rating add to its suitability for automotive or industrial environments where switching speed and robustness matter.

From a layout perspective, both devices share the same 6-TSSOP package (SOT-363), implying footprint compatibility. However, the higher gate charge and input capacitance of the 2N7002BKS,115 demand careful gate driver layout and possibly stronger gate drive capability to avoid slow switching and excessive switching losses. The UM6K33NTN’s lower gate drive requirement simplifies gate drive design but limits current handling.

Cost-wise, the 2N7002BKS,115’s automotive qualification and higher ratings may come at a premium compared to the UM6K33NTN, which appears to target lower power, general-purpose logic-level switching.


Use-case fit

Choose UM6K33NTN when…

Choose 2N7002BKS,115 when…


Drop-in compatibility

Both devices share the 6-TSSOP package and are dual N-channel MOSFET arrays, commonly in the SOT-363 footprint. This strongly suggests footprint compatibility. However, pin-to-pin compatibility is not explicitly confirmed by the datasheets; the internal pin assignments (source, gate, drain) and channel arrangements would need to be verified in the datasheets before substituting one for the other. Differences in gate threshold and drive requirements mean that even if pin-compatible, the switching characteristics and drive levels will differ, potentially requiring gate drive circuitry adjustments.


Alternatives to consider


This comparison should guide engineers in selecting between the UM6K33NTN and 2N7002BKS,115 based on exact load, voltage, gate drive, and thermal requirements rather