TAR5SB33(TE85L,F) vs MCP1700T-3302E/MAY: Linear Regulator Comparison

Quick verdict

For designs where ultra-low quiescent current and extended temperature range are priorities—such as battery-powered or always-on systems—the MCP1700T-3302E/MAY is the clear winner due to its 4 µA IQ and -40°C to 125°C rating. Conversely, if your design requires a higher maximum input voltage (up to 15 V) or an enable pin for power gating, the TAR5SB33(TE85L,F) is the better choice despite its higher quiescent current and lower maximum output current.

Spec comparison table

SpecTAR5SB33(TE85L,F)MCP1700T-3302E/MAYNotes
Control featuresEnable pinNoneEnable pin on TAR5SB33 allows software/hardware power gating; MCP1700 has no enable.
Quiescent current (Iq)850 µA4 µAMCP1700 IQ is 200× lower, critical for battery-powered or low-power systems.
Max input voltage15 V6 VTAR5SB33 supports higher input voltage, important for 12 V or higher rails.
Mounting typeSurface MountSurface MountBoth are SMT; no difference.
Number of regulators11Both single-output devices.
Operating temperature-40°C to 85°C-40°C to 125°CMCP1700 supports wider temp range, suitable for industrial or harsh environments.
Output configurationPositivePositiveBoth positive regulators.
Max output current200 mA250 mAMCP1700 provides 25% higher max output current capacity.
Output typeFixed 3.3 VFixed 3.3 VBoth fixed voltage; no difference.
Package caseSC-74A (SOT-753)6-DFN (2x2 mm)MCP1700’s smaller DFN package reduces PCB area and improves thermal path via exposed pad.
Protection featuresOvercurrent, OvertemperatureOvercurrent, Overtemperature, Short circuitMCP1700 adds short-circuit protection, improving fault tolerance.
PSRR70 dB @ 1 kHz44 dB @ 100 HzTAR5SB33 has better PSRR at 1 kHz (important for noise-sensitive analog circuits).
Dropout voltage0.2 V @ 50 mA0.35 V @ 250 mATAR5SB33 has lower dropout at moderate current but MCP1700 specs at max current; depends on load.
Supplier device packageSMV6-DFN (2x2)MCP1700’s exposed pad DFN improves heat dissipation and PCB layout flexibility.

Design trade-offs

The most striking difference between these devices is the quiescent current (Iq). The MCP1700’s 4 µA quiescent current is orders of magnitude lower than the TAR5SB33’s 850 µA. This makes the MCP1700 far more suitable for battery-powered applications or systems requiring long standby times. The trade-off is that the MCP1700’s maximum input voltage is limited to 6 V, which constrains its use in 12 V or higher input rails without additional pre-regulation.

Thermally, the MCP1700 benefits from its exposed pad 6-DFN package, which provides better PCB heat sinking capability despite its smaller size. The TAR5SB33’s SC-74A package is physically larger and less thermally efficient but can handle slightly higher input voltages. The maximum output current rating also differs: 200 mA for the TAR5SB33 versus 250 mA for the MCP1700. While the MCP1700 supports higher current, its dropout voltage at 250 mA is higher (0.35 V) compared to the TAR5SB33’s 0.2 V at 50 mA, so the dropout advantage depends heavily on load conditions.

The presence of an enable pin on the TAR5SB33 adds flexibility for firmware or hardware power management, allowing the regulator to be turned off to save power. The MCP1700 lacks this feature, meaning it is always on when powered.

PSRR is another consideration: the TAR5SB33 offers 70 dB at 1 kHz, which is notably better than the MCP1700’s 44 dB at 100 Hz. This suggests the TAR5SB33 is preferable in noise-sensitive analog front-end circuits or RF applications where power supply ripple rejection is critical.

From a layout perspective, the MCP1700’s small DFN package with an exposed pad requires careful PCB design to maximize thermal dissipation, but enables significant space savings. The TAR5SB33’s larger SOT-753 package is more straightforward to hand solder and may be preferable in less space-constrained designs.

Cost considerations are not available from the data, but typically Microchip’s MCP1700 family is widely used and available at competitive prices. The Toshiba part might have a niche in applications requiring higher input voltage or enable control.

Use-case fit

Choose TAR5SB33(TE85L,F) when…

Choose MCP1700T-3302E/MAY when…

Drop-in compatibility

These two devices are not pin- or footprint-compatible. The TAR5SB33 uses an SC-74A (SOT-753) package, while the MCP1700 is in a 6-DFN (2×2 mm) with an exposed pad. Pinouts differ, and the MCP1700 lacks an enable pin. Substituting one for the other will require PCB redesign and potentially firmware changes to handle enable signaling (or lack thereof). Input voltage and current handling differences must also be considered before a substitution.

Alternatives to consider