NX3008NBKS,115 vs SSM6N57NU,LF MOSFET Array Comparison

Quick verdict

For low-current, low-power switching or level-shifting applications where a compact dual MOSFET with minimal gate charge and automotive qualification is needed, the NX3008NBKS,115 offers better integration and ease of drive. For higher-current loads up to 4A and higher power dissipation (1W max), the SSM6N57NU,LF is the clear choice due to significantly lower R_DS(on) and higher continuous current rating, though it demands stronger gate drive and careful thermal design.


Spec comparison table

SpecNX3008NBKS,115SSM6N57NU,LFNotes
Configuration2 N-Channel (Dual)2 N-Channel (Dual)Equivalent
Drain-Source Voltage (max)30 V30 VEquivalent
Continuous Drain Current @ 25°C350 mA4 ASSM6N57NU,LF supports over 10x higher load current
Maximum Power Dissipation445 mW1 WSSM6N57NU,LF can dissipate more than twice the power
R_DS(on) Typ @ 25°C1.0 – 1.4 Ω (typ)46 mΩ @ 2A, 4.5VSSM6N57NU,LF has roughly 20–30x lower on-resistance, greatly reducing conduction losses
Gate Charge Q_G (max @ 4.5V)0.68 nC4 nCNX3008NBKS,115 requires much less gate charge, easing gate drive and switching losses
Input Capacitance C_iss (max)50 pF @ 15 V310 pF @ 10 VNX3008NBKS,115 has significantly lower input capacitance, beneficial for high-speed drive
Operating Temperature Range (junction)-55°C to +150°CUp to +150°CEquivalent
Package Type6-TSSOP6-µDFN (2x2)Different packages; footprint not directly compatible
Thermal Resistance Junction-to-Ambient (typ)~300 K/W (per device)Not specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 data provided; SSM6N57NU,LF requires reference
Drain Current Spiking Max1.4 ANot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 spike current rating low compared to SSM6N57NU,LF
Gate Threshold Voltage V_GS(th) (max)1.1 V @ 250 µA1 V @ 1 mASimilar threshold; slight variation not critical
Electrostatic Discharge Max Rating2000 VNot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 offers explicit ESD rating
Power Dissipation (typ)280 mWNot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 typical power dissipation given
Gate Leakage Current (typ @ 25°C)0.2–1 µANot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 has very low gate leakage
Gate-Source Voltage Max/Min±8 VNot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 explicitly rated for ±8 V gate voltage
Transient Thermal Impedance (typ @ 100 ms)0.5 K/WNot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 data available; SSM6N57NU,LF unknown
Drain-Source Leakage Current (typ @ 25°C)1 µANot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 data available
Package Outline Dimensions2.2 mm × 1.35 mm2 mm × 2 mmSSM6N57NU,LF smaller footprint but different shape
Total Power Dissipation Max990 mWNot specifiedNX3008NBKS,115 maximum total power dissipation specified
TechnologyMOSFET (Metal Oxide)MOSFET (Metal Oxide)Equivalent

Design trade-offs

The NX3008NBKS,115 is designed for low-current, low-voltage switching with a maximum continuous drain current of 350 mA and a relatively high R_DS(on) around 1.0 to 1.4 Ω typ at 25°C. This translates to significant conduction losses if used at higher currents but is sufficient for signal-level switching, load switching in low-power circuits, or level shifting. Its very low gate charge (~0.68 nC max at 4.5 V) and low input capacitance (~50 pF) make it easy to drive with weak gate drivers or microcontroller GPIOs without adding significant switching losses or delay. The 6-TSSOP package is automotive qualified (AEC-Q101), which adds reliability confidence in automotive and industrial applications.

In contrast, the SSM6N57NU,LF targets higher power applications, with a continuous drain current rating of 4 A and a very low R_DS(on) of 46 mΩ at 2 A and 4.5 V gate drive. This reduces conduction losses dramatically, making it suitable for power-handling tasks like load switching, DC-DC converters, or power multiplexing at moderate voltages (30 V max). However, the gate charge is roughly six times higher (4 nC max at 4.5 V), which increases gate drive power and switching losses, necessitating a stronger gate driver and potentially more careful layout to minimize gate ringing and EMI. The 6-µDFN package includes an exposed pad, which supports better thermal dissipation if properly soldered to a PCB thermal pad, but requires more attention to thermal design and PCB layout.

Thermal considerations are critical. The NX3008NBKS,115 has detailed thermal resistance data (~300 K/W junction-to-ambient per device), indicating it is suitable only for very low-power dissipation applications without heatsinking. The SSM6N57NU,LF’s power rating (1 W max) and exposed pad package imply better thermal performance, but the datasheet does not specify thermal resistance values explicitly, so designers must rely on PCB thermal design and measurement to ensure safe operation at high current loads.

The different packages and footprints (6-TSSOP vs 6-µDFN 2x2 mm) mean that the devices are not footprint compatible and will require PCB redesign if swapping. The NX3008NBKS,115’s smaller gate charge and input capacitance simplify gate drive design, beneficial in low-power systems or where microcontroller IO pins drive the MOSFETs directly. The SSM6N57NU,LF’s higher gate charge and current capability require more robust gate drivers and possibly additional components like gate resistors or snubbers.

Cost considerations are not detailed here, but typically the smaller, lower-power NX3008NBKS,115 will be less expensive at volume than the higher-current, lower R_DS(on) SSM6N57NU,LF, which integrates more silicon and requires better package technology.


Use-case fit

Choose NX3008NBKS,115 when…

Choose SSM6N57NU,LF when…


Drop-in compatibility

These two MOSFET arrays are not pin- or footprint-compatible. The NX3008NBKS,115 uses a 6-TSSOP package, while the SSM6N57NU,LF uses a smaller 6-µDFN (2x2 mm) package with an exposed pad. Their pinouts and pad arrangements differ significantly, so substituting one for the other requires a PCB redesign. Gate drive and thermal design considerations also differ substantially, so simple drop-in replacement is not feasible without careful verification.


Alternatives to consider