NX3008CBKS,115 vs 2N7002BKS,115 MOSFET Arrays: A Detailed Comparison

Quick verdict

For low-voltage, mixed-signal applications requiring complementary MOSFET pairs and very low gate charge, the NX3008CBKS,115 is the better choice due to its integrated N- and P-channel devices, lower gate threshold, and balanced current ratings. For higher voltage switching (up to 60 V) with simple N-channel requirements and moderate current (~300 mA), the 2N7002BKS,115 offers better voltage margin and power dissipation capability despite higher gate threshold and on-resistance.


Spec comparison table

SpecNX3008CBKS,1152N7002BKS,115Notes
ConfigurationN- and P-Channel2 × N-ChannelNX3008CBKS offers complementary pair; 2N7002BKS is dual N-channel only
Drain-Source Voltage Max (V)30 V60 V2N7002BKS doubles voltage rating, suitable for higher voltage rails
Continuous Drain Current (Id)350 mA (N), 200 mA (P) @ 25°C300 mA (Ta)NX3008CBKS N-channel can handle slightly higher current; P-channel lower
Power Dissipation Max445 mW295 mWNX3008CBKS has higher max power dissipation despite lower voltage rating
On-Resistance Rds(on) Max1.4 Ω @ 350 mA, 4.5 V1.6 Ω @ 500 mA, 10 VNX3008CBKS has lower Rds(on) at lower gate voltage; 2N7002BKS rated at higher V and I
Gate Threshold Voltage (Vgs_th)1.1 V @ 250µA (max)2.1 V @ 250µA (max)NX3008CBKS has significantly lower gate threshold voltage, easier to drive from logic
Gate Charge Qg Max @ 4.5V0.68 nC0.6 nCComparable gate charge; marginally lower for 2N7002BKS but similar in practice
Input Capacitance Ciss Max50 pF @ 15 V50 pF @ 10 VSimilar input capacitance; no major difference
Package6-TSSOP (SOT-363)6-TSSOP (SOT-363)Same package type and pin count
Operating Temperature Range (TJ)-55°C to 150°C-55°C to 150°CEquivalent thermal range
QualificationAEC-Q101 (Automotive)AEC-Q101 (Automotive)Both meet automotive qualification
Drain Current PeakNot specified1.2 A2N7002BKS can handle short pulses at higher current
Power Dissipation TypicalNot specified295 mWNX3008CBKS max rating higher, 2N7002BKS typical power dissipation given
Gate Drive Voltage MaxNot explicitly specified20 V max2N7002BKS max gate voltage rating higher, but likely similar operating range
Leakage Current Max @ 25°CNot specified1 µA (Id leakage)2N7002BKS leakage current data available; low leakage
Switching Times (td_on/off, tfall)Not specifiedtd_on typ 10 ns, td_off typ 24 ns, tfall typ 7 ns2N7002BKS switching times available; useful for high-speed switching applications

Design trade-offs

The NX3008CBKS,115 integrates complementary N- and P-channel MOSFETs in a single 6-TSSOP package, making it well-suited for half-bridge configurations, level shifting, or low-side/high-side switching in low-voltage systems (max 30 V). The lower gate threshold voltage (1.1 V max) means it can be driven directly from low-voltage logic signals with minimal margin, reducing the need for additional gate drivers. The P-channel device’s continuous current rating is limited to 200 mA, so it’s not for high-current high-side switching, but sufficient for signal-level switching and load control.

In contrast, the 2N7002BKS,115 offers dual N-channel devices rated to 60 V, doubling the voltage headroom for applications with higher supply voltages or transient spikes. It has a slightly higher continuous current rating at 300 mA and a peak pulse rating up to 1.2 A, useful for pulsed loads or inductive switching where current spikes occur. However, it has a significantly higher gate threshold voltage (2.1 V max) and higher Rds(on) at typical gate voltages (1.6 Ω @ 10 V, 500 mA), meaning it requires a stronger drive signal and will dissipate more conduction loss at equal load current.

Thermally, the NX3008CBKS’s power dissipation rating (445 mW max) is higher than the 2N7002BKS’s 295 mW max, but at half the voltage rating. In practice, the 2N7002BKS’s lower thermal resistance per device (typical 370 K/W) and higher voltage rating make it better for higher voltage but lower power dissipation applications. The NX3008CBKS’s balanced complementary architecture can reduce board area and component count for low-voltage complementary switching, which may offset its slightly lower voltage and current ratings.

Gate charge is similar between the two, with the NX3008CBKS at 0.68 nC and the 2N7002BKS at 0.6 nC at 4.5 V, so switching losses will be comparable at low gate voltages. The 2N7002BKS’s documented switching speed (on the order of 10 ns on and 24 ns off) suggests it is optimized for faster switching than the NX3008CBKS, which does not publish switching times. This can matter in high-frequency switching applications or where switching losses dominate.

Cost-wise, the 2N7002BKS’s simpler dual N-channel configuration and higher voltage rating typically make it a lower-cost option for high-voltage low-current switching, while the NX3008CBKS’s complementary pair and higher power dissipation rating tend to increase cost but reduce system complexity.


Use-case fit

Choose NX3008CBKS,115 when…

Choose 2N7002BKS,115 when…


Drop-in compatibility

Both devices share the same package outline and pin count (6-TSSOP / SOT-363), but they are not pin-to-pin compatible due to the NX3008CBKS having complementary N- and P-channel devices internally, while the 2N7002BKS contains two N-channel devices only. Pin functions and internal connections differ; substituting one for the other without schematic and PCB redesign is not feasible.

The footprint is compatible, so a PCB designed for either package could physically accommodate the other, but electrical and functional compatibility is not guaranteed. No explicit pinout cross-reference is provided in the datasheets, so direct drop-in replacement is not recommended without detailed verification.


Alternatives to consider


This comparison should help you select the appropriate MOSFET array based on voltage, current, switching speed, and configuration requirements for your automotive or industrial design.