LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB vs. LM2596T-3.3: A Practical Comparison

The LM2596 family remains a workhorse for simple, cost-sensitive buck conversions. The LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB provides flexibility for variable output voltages, while the LM2596T-3.3 offers a fixed 3.3V output. For applications requiring adjustable voltage to accommodate different system needs, the ADJ version is the clear winner. However, for simple 3.3V regulation where component count and board space are paramount, the fixed-voltage part offers a slight edge in simplicity and potentially lower cost.

Spec Comparison Table

SpecLM2596T-ADJ/NOPBLM2596T-3.3Notes
FunctionStep-DownStep-DownIdentical
Output ConfigurationPositivePositiveIdentical
TopologyBuckBuckIdentical
Output TypeAdjustableFixedADJ offers voltage programmability.
Number of Outputs11Identical
Input Voltage Min4.5V-LM2596T-3.3 datasheet doesn’t specify a minimum. Assume it’s similar to the ADJ version, 4.5V.
Input Voltage Max40V40VIdentical
Output Voltage Min1.2V3.3VADJ offers a wider range of voltages.
Output Voltage Max37V-LM2596T-3.3 datasheet doesn’t specify a maximum. Assume it’s similar to the ADJ version, 37V.
Output Current Max3A3AIdentical
Switching Frequency Typ150kHz150kHzIdentical
Synchronous RectifierNoNoIdentical
Operating Temperature Range-40°C ~ 125°C-40°C ~ 125°CIdentical
Mounting TypeThrough HoleThrough HoleIdentical
Package CaseTO-220-5 Formed LeadsTO-220-5Slight difference in lead form; likely footprint compatible but verify.
Supplier Device PackageTO-220-5TO-220-5LTO-220-5L has slightly longer leads; likely footprint compatible but verify.

Design Trade-offs

The most significant design difference is the adjustable output of the LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB. This requires external resistors to set the output voltage, adding two components and increasing the potential for error in the output voltage. The LM2596T-3.3, on the other hand, eliminates this complexity. However, the ADJ version’s programmability allows for adapting to varying system voltage requirements, which can be critical in some designs.

Thermal considerations are similar for both parts given their identical current rating and power dissipation characteristics. Both operate at 150kHz, which dictates a minimum trace width for switching loop integrity to avoid excessive EMI. Layout sensitivity is typical of older buck converters; careful attention to ground plane continuity and minimizing loop area is essential for both parts. Gate drive requirements are identical; both rely on the internal MOSFETs and don’t offer external gate drive control.

Efficiency curves are not provided in the datasheets, but it’s reasonable to assume they are similar. The fixed output voltage of the LM2596T-3.3 might offer a marginal improvement in efficiency due to slightly optimized internal components, but this would be minimal and difficult to measure without detailed testing. Cost at volume will likely favor the LM2596T-3.3 due to the reduced component count.

Use-Case Fit

Choose LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB when…

Choose LM2596T-3.3 when…

Drop-in Compatibility

Pin compatibility is likely, but not guaranteed. The TO-220 package is standard, but the lead form on the LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB is “formed,” while the LM2596T-3.3 is a standard TO-220. Footprint compatibility is also likely, but the slightly longer leads on the LM2596T-3.3 (TO-220-5L) necessitate verification of the PCB layout. Substitution requires careful review of the PCB layout and component placement.

Alternatives to Consider