LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB vs. LM2596S-5.0-EV: A Practical Comparison

Quick verdict: For applications requiring precise output voltage control and flexibility, the LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB is the clear winner. However, if you need a fixed 5V output, reduced BOM count, and are comfortable with slightly lower design flexibility, the LM2596S-5.0-EV offers a compelling, and often cheaper, solution.

Spec comparison table

SpecLM2596T-ADJ/NOPBLM2596S-5.0-EVNotes
functionStep-DownStep-DownBoth perform the same basic function.
output_configurationPositivePositiveIdentical.
topologyBuckBuckIdentical.
output_typeAdjustableFixed 5VThis is the most significant difference.
number_of_outputs11Identical.
input_voltage_min4.5Vup to 40VBoth accept wide input ranges.
input_voltage_max40Vup to 40VBoth have the same maximum input voltage.
output_voltage_min1.2V1.2VIdentical.
output_voltage_max37V37VIdentical.
output_current_max3A3A ±4%LM2596S-5.0-EV’s current rating has a tighter tolerance.
switching_frequency_typ150kHz150kHzIdentical.
synchronous_rectifierNoNoIdentical.
operating_temperature_range-40°C ~ 125°C-40°C ~ 125°CIdentical.
mounting_typeThrough HoleSurface MountTH vs. SMD impacts board layout and assembly.
package_caseTO-220-5 Formed LeadsTO-263-6, D2PAK (5 Leads + Tab), TO-263BASMD package enables higher density designs.
input_voltage_HV_versionN/A57VLM2596S-5.0-EV has a higher input voltage rating.
output_switching_frequency_typ150kHz150kHzIdentical.
output_voltage_adjustable_range_min1.2V1.2VIdentical.
output_voltage_adjustable_range_max37V37VIdentical.
oscillator_frequency_minN/A127/110 kHzLM2596S-5.0-EV has a wider frequency range.
oscillator_frequency_maxN/A150kHzLM2596S-5.0-EV has a narrower frequency range.
feedback_bias_currentN/A10 nALM2596S-5.0-EV has a lower feedback bias current.
feedback_bias_current_maxN/A50/100 nALM2596S-5.0-EV has a higher feedback bias current limit.
saturation_voltage_typN/A1.16 VLM2596S-5.0-EV has a lower saturation voltage.
max_duty_cycle100%100%Identical.
min_duty_cycle00Identical.
peak_current_minN/A3.6/3.4 ALM2596S-5.0-EV has a higher peak current rating.
peak_current_typN/A4.5 ALM2596S-5.0-EV has a higher peak current rating.
peak_current_maxN/A6.9/7.5 ALM2596S-5.0-EV has a higher peak current rating.
output_leakage_current_typN/A2 mALM2596S-5.0-EV has a higher output leakage current.
quiescent_current_typN/A5 mALM2596S-5.0-EV has a lower quiescent current.
standby_current_typN/A80 µALM2596S-5.0-EV has a lower standby current.
thermal_resistance_TO_220_to_caseN/AN/AN/A
thermal_resistance_TO_263_to_caseN/AN/AN/A
on_off_pin_logic_input_voltage_highN/AN/AN/A
input_filter_capacitor_minN/AN/AN/A
inductor_value_typN/A33µHLM2596S-5.0-EV has a specific inductor value.

Design trade-offs

The most significant difference is the fixed 5V output of the LM2596S-5.0-EV versus the adjustable output of the LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB. This impacts the BOM. The adjustable version requires external resistors to set the output voltage, adding cost and potentially increasing noise. The fixed output simplifies the design and can reduce BOM count.

Thermal considerations are influenced by the package type. The TO-220 package of the LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB requires a larger heatsink in high-current applications, while the smaller footprint of the LM2596S-5.0-EV demands careful PCB layout to manage heat dissipation. The lower saturation voltage of the LM2596S-5.0-EV suggests potentially slightly better efficiency at higher load currents, but this is highly dependent on component selection and PCB layout.

The fixed inductor value in the LM2596S-5.0-EV means you must use that specific inductor value. The adjustable part offers more flexibility in inductor selection for optimization. The slightly higher output leakage current in the LM2596S-5.0-EV is a minor concern, but should be considered in sensitive applications. The lower quiescent current of the LM2596S-5.0-EV translates to slightly better efficiency in battery-powered applications.

Use-case fit

Choose LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB when…

Choose LM2596S-5.0-EV when…

Drop-in compatibility

Pin compatibility is likely, but footprint compatibility is not guaranteed. The TO-220 package of the LM2596T-ADJ/NOPB is significantly larger than the TO-263/DPAK packages of the LM2596S-5.0-EV. Substituting one for the other will require PCB layout modifications. The fixed inductor value of the LM2596S-5.0-EV also means that if you are swapping, you’re also swapping the inductor.

Alternatives to consider