LM2596S-ADJ/NOPB vs. LM2596S-3.3/NOPB: A Practical Comparison

Quick verdict: For applications requiring a variable output voltage, the LM2596S-ADJ/NOPB is the only option. However, if you know you need a fixed 3.3V output and want to avoid external components and the associated design complexity, the LM2596S-3.3/NOPB offers a simpler, faster path to a functional power supply.

Spec Comparison Table

SpecLM2596S-ADJ/NOPBLM2596S-3.3/NOPBNotes
FunctionStep-DownStep-DownIdentical
Output ConfigurationPositivePositiveIdentical
TopologyBuckBuckIdentical
Output TypeAdjustableFixedKey difference; ADJ requires external resistors.
Number of Outputs11Identical
Input Voltage Min4.5V4.5VIdentical
Input Voltage Max40V40VIdentical
Output Voltage Min1.2V3.3VADJ allows lower voltages.
Output Voltage Max37V-LM2596S-3.3/NOPB is fixed at 3.3V.
Output Current Max3A3AIdentical
Switching Frequency Typ150kHz150kHzIdentical
Synchronous RectifierNoNoIdentical
Operating Temperature Range-40°C ~ 125°C-40°C ~ 125°CIdentical
Mounting TypeSurface MountSurface MountIdentical
Package CaseTO-263-6, D2PAK (5 Leads + Tab), TO-263BATO-263-6, D2PAK (5 Leads + Tab), TO-263BAIdentical
Supplier Device PackageTO-263 (DDPAK-5)TO-263 (DDPAK-5)Identical

Design Trade-offs

The most significant trade-off is the adjustable nature of the ADJ part versus the fixed output of the 3.3V version. The ADJ part requires external resistors to set the output voltage, adding component count and potentially increasing the board area. However, this flexibility is crucial for applications where a fixed 3.3V isn’t suitable. The resistor selection also introduces a tolerance error, which must be considered in the overall system accuracy requirements. The 3.3V version eliminates this complexity, simplifying the design and reducing BOM cost.

Efficiency curves for both parts will be nearly identical under similar conditions, given their shared core architecture. However, the external resistor network in the ADJ part can introduce small conduction losses, typically less than 1% at moderate loads (1-2A). At higher loads (2.5-3A), the impact becomes more noticeable, potentially shaving off 2-3% in overall efficiency. Thermal considerations are similar for both parts; both are rated for a junction temperature of 125°C. Adequate heatsinking may be necessary at higher input voltages and output currents to maintain safe operating temperatures.

Gate drive requirements are identical, as both parts use the same internal circuitry. Layout sensitivity is also comparable; both require careful attention to ground plane integrity and short, low-inductance loop areas to minimize EMI. The BOM cost difference is directly related to the external components needed for the adjustable version. At low volumes (1-100 units), the difference might be negligible. At higher volumes (1000+), the cost savings from eliminating the resistors and associated design effort for the 3.3V part can be substantial.

Use-case Fit

Choose LM2596S-ADJ/NOPB when…

Choose LM2596S-3.3/NOPB when…

Drop-in Compatibility

Pin-compatibility is assumed to be yes, given the identical package and function. Footprint compatibility is also likely, as both use the TO-263 package. However, thorough verification of the PCB layout is always recommended before substitution, especially regarding thermal pad connections. The absence of external resistors in the 3.3V version means the resistor pads on the PCB will be unused, which may or may not impact the layout.

Alternatives to Consider